Lately all the speculation about Jeb Bush has focused on his
last name, asking whether as a ‘Bush’ he
can win following his father and his brother. Both left the Presidency in the
midst of recessions and his brother is also associated with unpopular and ruinous adventures abroad.
In so doing, the focus has not been sufficiently on Jeb himself. Occasionally stories do come out—for example when the Clinton email flap surfaced, it was pointed out that JebBush used his own private email server while he was Governor but in fact that is something of a non issue since apparently it’s the norm among potential presidential candidates.
In so doing, the focus has not been sufficiently on Jeb himself. Occasionally stories do come out—for example when the Clinton email flap surfaced, it was pointed out that JebBush used his own private email server while he was Governor but in fact that is something of a non issue since apparently it’s the norm among potential presidential candidates.
But the big story regarding Jeb Bush is not what he did
WHILE he was Governor, it’s what he did after leaving office. His first job was as a paid consultant to
Lehman Brothers bank. In case you
forgot, Lehman Brothers was the touchstone for the economic collapse. During
the 2000’s, rampant speculation in the housing market and the quick money to be
turned as a result led a number of banks, including Lehman Brothers, to invest
their money in risky investments tied to home mortgages that quickly turned bad
when the housing market tanked. And what did Jeb do for Lehman Brothers? Well, he was assigned a special mission
(while his brother was still in the White House.) Jeb was asked to go to Mexico and try to persuade billionaire Carlos Slim to bail out the
company.
Slim, the world’s second richest man, patiently listened to Jeb’s plea, but could see where Lehman Brothers was headed and wanted no part of propping it up to stave off the inevitable collapse. It is hard to imagine that Jeb, who is supposed to be brainy, didn’t see it as well. So as a consultant, one has to question either his judgment in trying to get people to invest in a bank that was sinking like the Titanic if he was one of the few in the company who didn’t see that, or his ethics if he did see what was happening.
So after the collapse of Lehman Brothers, did Jeb leave the
banking business? Not at all. In fact,
he moved on to a position as a consultant with of the British banking
giant Barclay’s (a position he kept until very recently when he resigned all of
his board positions and other positions in order to begin putting together a run for President.) So
how did Barclay’s do with Jeb Bush advising them?
He stepped into Barclay’s as the company was actively
working to manipulate LIBOR, officially
the “London Interbank Offered Rate,” which is a key rate used to set fixed
interest rates. Barclay’s continued with
the collusion of several other large banks including the Royal Bank of
Scotland, JP Morgan-Chase, Deutsche Bank and Citibank (which it is hard to imagine a financial consultant would be unaware of) to manipulate the rates until in 2011 when it
was reported that the banks were under investigation and then in February 2012
when the scheme unraveled. Eventually
Barclay’s agreed to fines of nearly half a billion dollars to several different
international regulatory agencies. As part of their agreement with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Barclay’s agreed that some fixed interest rates may have changed as a result of the
manipulation.
This is not a
small thing. One memo between a trader
and Barclay’s revealed that for each basis point (0.01%) that Libor was moved, those involved could net, "about a couple of million dollars."
After Barclay’s got out of
the business of manipulating interest rates (or at least we would hope) they
moved on to currency. Some of the same
banks Barclay’s colluded with on LIBOR, discovered a new way to gamble with the
economy in order to skim some money off the top. They all colluded on foreign currency
exchange rates. In theory international currency is supposed to ‘float,’ so
that people who want to, for example, trade in their Euros for dollars can do
so at a rate that is set purely by the international markets; high demand for a currency makes it more
expensive and lower demand reduces the price.
However, the banks discovered they could move the price around the
edges, and as a result make a lot of money by investing in currency that they
could then move the exchange rate just enough to make a profit. Never mind of course that the profit they
made means someone else lost money, they
found they could make money, and a lot of it. After being burned by the LIBOR
fine, Barclays’ this time became the ‘snitch’ in the group and essentially ratted out the others ; in exchange for a smaller
fine. Because of their
cooperation, Barclays was subject to a fine but got a ‘deferred prosecution
agreement’ which in effect means they don’t actually have to pay the fine. All they have to do is keep their nose
clean.
That can’t be too hard,
can it? Apparently, it is pretty hard, for big banks anyway. Like a hungry swarm of locusts, the same clique
of megabanks (including Barclay’s) that had such a big role in manipulating
interest rates and currency exchanges,
moved on to manipulating the price of metals. As before, the banks raked in big profits
while small investors were left holding the bag for the losses on one side of an equation where the other side turned into big bucks for banks. The investigation into price fixing in the
metals markets is ongoing, but suffice it to say that I suspect a lot of ‘gold
bugs’ will be furious that instead of the free market determining the price of
their favorite metal, it was instead a small group of deeply pocketed bankers
who decided what it would be. And again,
any consultant on any bank that was unaware of the metal price manipulation (especially after
having gone through the LIBOR and FOREX,
or foreign currency exchange manipulation scandals) would have been completely absent in their
duties to pay attention to who they were working for. Maybe that's why the establishment wants Jeb so much. Some apologists for his brother claim George W. was 'out to lunch' and could be manipulated by a Praetorian Guard who could pull his strings. Jeb's work for Barclays when they were involved in financial scandal after financial scandal after financial scandal seems to suggest that that might be the case.
It is true that there is
more that could be said about Jeb Bush and the record of corporations he has worked for or been on the board of both
in and outside of the banking industry since leaving office, but the most important thing that
can be pointed out is this, because it speaks to the entire outlook of the organization he was advising at Barclay’s: The
year (2013-2014) when profits fell 22% (largely because of fines) and the
bank was caught up in three major scandals
(in other words a bad year for Barclay’s) the bank laid off 19,000 people followed by an announcement they would lay off another 12,000 people because of an abysmal earnings report.
BUT what did Barclay's do
after the abysmal performance and layoffs of thousands of people? What the boards of large companies often do
these days (too often): paid 481 people at the top enormous bonuses
of over a million pounds (meaning substantially over a million
dollars) apiece. This reward voted by
the members of the board of the bank that Jeb Bush was advising is a depressingly familiar narrative. The members of the Board (millionaires
themselves) apparently at least understand
and do not hold responsible the millionaires who work for them at the top of
the company (including those Jeb was working with,) and understand them well enough to give them massive bonuses even
when they do a poor job or harm the company by exposing it to unwarranted
risk. So what did Jeb Bush do? Simple. Continued advising Barclay's.
So to summarize, after sustaining
losses but rewarding the people in charge (likely the only ones the Board
Members see very often) the bank Jeb was advising balanced the books
by cutting the jobs of secretaries, data analysts and computer techs, and
perhaps also others who take orders from the people who actually were in charge
and caused the poor performance in the first place.
That kind of thinking, making the poor pay for the sins of the rich while rewarding the rich for sinning is standard fare for modern conservatives. But a letdown if you were optimistic that somehow this Bush would be different.
NOTE: AN EARLIER VERSION OF THIS POST NAMED JEB AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AT BARCLAY'S. THIS WAS BASED ON INFORMATION THAT WHEN IT WAS WRITTEN WAS WIDELY PUBLISHED ON THE INTERNET INCLUDING FROM SOME RELIABLE SOURCES, BUT HAS APPARENTLY BEEN WITHDRAWN. THIS POST HAS BEEN EDITED TO REFLECT WHAT IS NOW BEING REPORTED THAT JEB BUSH WAS AN ADVISOR TO BARCLAY'S BUT DID NOT SERVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
That kind of thinking, making the poor pay for the sins of the rich while rewarding the rich for sinning is standard fare for modern conservatives. But a letdown if you were optimistic that somehow this Bush would be different.
NOTE: AN EARLIER VERSION OF THIS POST NAMED JEB AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AT BARCLAY'S. THIS WAS BASED ON INFORMATION THAT WHEN IT WAS WRITTEN WAS WIDELY PUBLISHED ON THE INTERNET INCLUDING FROM SOME RELIABLE SOURCES, BUT HAS APPARENTLY BEEN WITHDRAWN. THIS POST HAS BEEN EDITED TO REFLECT WHAT IS NOW BEING REPORTED THAT JEB BUSH WAS AN ADVISOR TO BARCLAY'S BUT DID NOT SERVE ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
No comments:
Post a Comment