Friday, October 27, 2006

Sure those tax collectors have a heart: for the GOP

Those tax collectors don't have a heart, right?

That's the overwhelming perception of the IRS, but here's the good news:

IF YOU ARE A VICTIM OF HURRICANE KATRINA AND OWE BACK TAXES YOU WERE UNABLE TO PAY BECAUSE OF LAST YEAR'S DISASTER, THEY WON'T GO AFTER YOU FOR ELEVEN DAYS! That's right, no IRS collections there until November 8

The I.R.S. slows down before the election.

The commissioner of internal revenue has ordered his agency to delay collecting back taxes from Hurricane Katrina victims until after the Nov. 7 elections and the holiday season, saying he did so in part to avoid negative publicity.

The commissioner, Mark W. Everson, who has close ties to the White House, said in an interview that postponing collections until after the midterm elections, along with postponing notices to people who failed to file tax returns, was a routine effort to avoid casting the Internal Revenue Service in a bad light.

“We are very sensitive to political perceptions,” Mr. Everson said Wednesday, adding that he regularly discussed with his senior staff members when to take actions and make announcements in light of whether they would annoy a powerful member of Congress or get lost in the flow of news.

The tax agency has broad discretion to change filing deadlines in the case of disasters and has traditionally eased off tax collections before the December holidays.

But four former I.R.S. commissioners, who served under presidents of both parties, said that doing so because of an election was improper and indefensible.


A break around Christmas may be traditional, but a break before elections is unprecedented. October and November are business as usual months for your friendly IRS agent.

Say, you don't think that the fact that in the southeastern Louisiana district that includes St. Bernard and Plaquemines, the two parishes where Katrina first came ashore, Republicans are hoping to force Democrat Charlie Melancon, who barely won a close election in 2004 into a runoff has anything to do with this decision do you?

No comments: